Administrators, upwizcampeditors
0
edits
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
The ChaloChatu has {{srlink|Special:Statistics|{{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}}} articles, {{srlink|Special:ActiveUsers|{{NUMBEROFUSERS}}}} registered editors, and {{srlink|Special:ActiveUsers|{{NUMBEROFACTIVEUSERS}}}} active editors. An editor is considered active if they have made one or more edits in the past thirty days. | The ChaloChatu has {{srlink|Special:Statistics|{{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}}} articles, {{srlink|Special:ActiveUsers|{{NUMBEROFUSERS}}}} registered editors, and {{srlink|Special:ActiveUsers|{{NUMBEROFACTIVEUSERS}}}} active editors. An editor is considered active if they have made one or more edits in the past thirty days. | ||
== Critical reception== | |||
=== Accuracy of content=== | |||
Articles for traditional encyclopedias such as ''Encyclopædia Britannica'' are carefully and deliberately written by experts, lending such encyclopedias a reputation for accuracy. Conversely, Chalo Chatu has not yet been criticised as it still new to the Zambia eye and the world. | |||
==Nature of the project== | ==Nature of the project== |