Gwisho Hot-Springs: Difference between revisions

From Chalo Chatu, Zambia online encyclopedia
(Created page with "{{Infobox ancient site | name = <!-- required --> | native_name = | native_name_lang = | alternate_name = | image = | image_size = | alt...")
 
Line 107: Line 107:
==Culture==
==Culture==


The hunting methods of the Gwisho’s hunters were probably similar to those used by modern [[San people|San]]. Many arrowheads and link shafts were excavated from the site, indicating the use of the bow and arrow.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Forgotten Africa|last = Connah|first = |publisher = |year = 2004|isbn = |location = |pages = 22–24}}</ref> They also used spears as a hunting tool. Another method employed by the Gwisho inhabitants was the use of snares and traps. Animals could have been driven into swampy or scalding hot-parts of the hot-springs and then killed off. It is possible that the springs were fitted with devices for trapping and the scalding hot water could have been used to kill animals.
The hunting methods of the Gwisho’s hunters were probably similar to those used by modern San. Many arrowheads and link shafts were excavated from the site, indicating the use of the bow and arrow.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Forgotten Africa|last = Connah|first = |publisher = |year = 2004|isbn = |location = |pages = 22–24}}</ref> They also used spears as a hunting tool. Another method employed by the Gwisho inhabitants was the use of snares and traps. Animals could have been driven into swampy or scalding hot-parts of the hot-springs and then killed off. It is possible that the springs were fitted with devices for trapping and the scalding hot water could have been used to kill animals.


Barbel was the easiest fish to catch and most of the fish bones found were those of  barbels. They could have been speared in the shallows or trapped in shallow
Barbel was the easiest fish to catch and most of the fish bones found were those of  barbels. They could have been speared in the shallows or trapped in shallow